The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice

Chia sẻ
Nhúng
  • Xuất bản 15 Th04, 2019
  • This isn’t just a computer bug. It’s a scandal.
    Join the Video Lab! bit.ly/video-lab
    Two Boeing airplanes have fallen out of the air and crashed in the past six months. On the surface, this is a technical failure. But the real story is about a company's desire to beat their rival.
    Read about Boeing's efforts to get the 737 Max reinstated for flight here: www.vox.com/2019/4/5/18296646/boeing-737-max-mcas-software-update
    Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out www.vox.com.
    Watch our full video catalog: goo.gl/IZONyE
    Follow Vox on Facebook: goo.gl/U2g06o
    Or Twitter: goo.gl/XFrZ5H

NHẬN XÉT • 19 031

  • Sam Sam
    Sam Sam 10 giờ trước

    Typical American junk product... US is not capable of building a decent car, how on earth they thought they can build a decent Airplane??? Just check out all the passenger plane crashes and you will see 90% of them was made in usa planes... that's why everytime i'm flying I ask and make sure it's not an American plane...only Airbus is safe enough to fly with...

  • Derek Childress
    Derek Childress 12 giờ trước

    Very informative! Just leave well enough alone?

  • Aj
    Aj 15 giờ trước

    Boeing will declare bankruptcy. The cost of legal battles, payouts to families for wrongful death and loss of revenue due to no company buying a Boeing product ever again will force the company to declare bankruptcy. Unfortunately, this will not help heal the wounds and loss of trust....

    • Marc Pagan
      Marc Pagan 13 giờ trước

      Boeing is silent....for PR reasons, and justly, in morning.
      However, if sued the fact of poor pilot training will be addressed.
      This will settle prior to hitting a courtroom.

  • K B
    K B 15 giờ trước

    What would Trolls do without a good conspiricy?????

  • Majidy
    Majidy 16 giờ trước +1

    No one:
    ISIS: We take credit for the design flaw

  • TheVeryhumble
    TheVeryhumble 19 giờ trước

    Free, unregulated market. Hmm

  • Bernard Beaudreau
    Bernard Beaudreau 20 giờ trước

    Why not simply raise the plane using longer (vertical) landing gear?

  • GuideBeauté Jeu
    GuideBeauté Jeu 20 giờ trước

    so people were killed by software? wooow

  • tuna huna
    tuna huna 21 giờ trước

    Looks like multiple manslaughter charges to me!....

  • Jhon Ortiz
    Jhon Ortiz 21 giờ trước

    Scrap that plane design and make another one

  • Mrfairchap
    Mrfairchap 21 giờ trước

    Tragically, this was the inevitable result of years of arrogance and hubris from both the FAA and Boeing. They have been lovers for far too long now for it to be healthy for flight safety. At last, they have been found out, and it took way too many deaths to do so.

  • LS MerQ
    LS MerQ 22 giờ trước

    Money sadly still talks... and in this clip you can see that it's effecting us in a big and bad way.

  • SubiLife_914
    SubiLife_914 23 giờ trước

    All because of money lots of lives were lost

  • Ichika_Kaneki
    Ichika_Kaneki 23 giờ trước

    im form ethopia

  • kim bruess
    kim bruess Ngày trước

    a stiched togther rushjob. was nor properly designed

  • Alex Reckling
    Alex Reckling Ngày trước

    I was on a Boeing 737 Max on kuluhla but it wasn’t a bad flight

  • Levi Friedman
    Levi Friedman Ngày trước

    why couldnt Boeing just make the planes legs taller?

  • LenTex Brew
    LenTex Brew Ngày trước

    Boeing loves regulations for smaller competitors who can't necessarily afford them, but not for them.

  • Jet Valmonte
    Jet Valmonte Ngày trước

    Too much ignorance on this page. First, video authors who think they are aviation experts. Then viewers who are clueless about the aviation industry. Wait for the official accident investigation report. In the meantime, you can continue speculating or you can get a life.

  • Will Singh
    Will Singh Ngày trước

    People involved shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a plane again.

  • Law hertz
    Law hertz Ngày trước

    imagine building a company that people decide to use and this company kills hundreds of people giving them their services
    what company would be allowed to continue without legal concequences and more?

  • Eric Penner
    Eric Penner Ngày trước

    The 'real' in the title is superfluous.

  • Hypeoriginal
    Hypeoriginal Ngày trước

    they tried to blame it on our Ethiopian pilots. They should pay victim's relatives.

  • xb 1
    xb 1 Ngày trước

    They should of put the plane body higher so the plane body is not half a metre from the ground

  • Libertiner
    Libertiner Ngày trước

    Well then the CEO of Boeing killed a lot of people, and murders go to jail or get executed

  • George Washington Bush
    George Washington Bush 2 ngày trước

    Those engineers had to go to prison as murderers !

    • Ceci Gator
      Ceci Gator 14 giờ trước

      Blame innocent people for poor training?

  • mage
    mage 2 ngày trước

    (too much) *money is the root of all evil*

  • Orapeleng Tawana
    Orapeleng Tawana 2 ngày trước

    so people were killed by software? wooow

  • Constandinos Pappas
    Constandinos Pappas 2 ngày trước

    Surely enough, Boeing have serious avionics engineers in their ranks.
    And surely enough, these engineers must have advised those above that there was this risk that should be taken into account.
    Boeing decided to go ahead, KNOWING they were risking lives.
    If that is not criminal, I don't know what is. We're not talking about manslaughter here.

  • Constandinos Pappas
    Constandinos Pappas 2 ngày trước

    Since Boeing says it only needs some "software upgrade to fix the problem" (yeah, right), it sounds as if we're talking about a small technical problem.
    Loss of life? Who cares, we're insured, aren't we...? We'll fix this minor problem and everyone will be happy!
    I would like to see the CEO and all the chain of decision makers of theirs, to be aboard the first "fixed" 737 MAX, up in the air.
    Will they do it??? Of course not. If the matter was not so tragic, I would be LMAO!

    After everything about the 737 MAX has been said so far, what stays in people's minds is not about this plane alone; people will wonder which else of their planes can be trusted now.
    Bottom line: Boeing has managed to irreparably damage its name.
    For a few bucks...

  • Chuck You
    Chuck You 2 ngày trước

    Free vacation for all demonrat politicians, destination Dominican Republic, flights will be on 737 Max. You’re going to love it, be ready to travel before the 2020 elections. And take your illegals with you.

  • Mr Coffee Lover SumBtch
    Mr Coffee Lover SumBtch 2 ngày trước

    For the entire A320 family, 118 aviation accidents and incidents have occurred (the latest one being Afriqiyah Airways Flight 209 on 23 Dec 2016),[1] including 35 hull loss accidents (the last one being EgyptAir Flight 804 on 19 May 2016),[2] and a total of 1393 fatalities in 17 fatal accidents (the most recent being EgyptAir Flight 804).[3]

  • OGDC
    OGDC 2 ngày trước

    Boeing should be sued.

  • Alisya Thahira
    Alisya Thahira 2 ngày trước

    boeing


    *cancelled*

  • dessnom
    dessnom 2 ngày trước

    i hope the plane after the Boeing nma/797 will be a proper successor to the Boeing 737
    it should have a modernized version of the 737 cockpit
    it should be as high of the ground as the a320 or 757
    composite construction should be used
    engines should be the cmf leap 1b or similar engine
    enough range to go from the west coast of Europe to the west coast of america
    there should be 5 models
    7107-6, 7107-7, 7107-8, 7107-9 and 7107-10
    -6 would replace the 737-700
    -7 would replace the max 7
    -8 would replace the max 8, -800 and -900
    -9 would replace the max 9 and -900 er
    -10 would replace the max 10

  • ANTI SALAM-SALAMAN CLUB
    ANTI SALAM-SALAMAN CLUB 2 ngày trước

    BOEING kill my fella...

  • vicki hindermyer
    vicki hindermyer 2 ngày trước

    Russians did it, RUSSIANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • John Kurtz
    John Kurtz 2 ngày trước

    Why didn't t Boeing put longer landing gear on the Max so the new engines would fit with no problem .

    • wan nuur
      wan nuur 2 ngày trước

      John Kurtz gravity point dude...hw do u stabilize the giant bird by longer d lnding gear?

  • Nolan The dab king
    Nolan The dab king 2 ngày trước +2

    How about boeing just remove the MCAS all together

  • Scott Wagley
    Scott Wagley 3 ngày trước

    My question is why did so many flights not have any issues and then these two crashed?

  • Kabin Raj Luitel
    Kabin Raj Luitel 3 ngày trước +1

    Boeing 737 max should be banned forever!!!

  • Leon Ledergerber
    Leon Ledergerber 3 ngày trước

    I hope there will be Justice for this, hundreds of People died, why? Because they wanted to compete, and didnt mention the MCAS.

  • Leon Ledergerber
    Leon Ledergerber 3 ngày trước

    Unacceptable.

  • Gungung Gadung
    Gungung Gadung 3 ngày trước

    Whoopsie.

  • Igor Dubrovski
    Igor Dubrovski 3 ngày trước

    Boeing please no more easter eggs in your modern avionics and navigation and flight control systems. Lets be clear - if it's not in the manual it's a major flaw and needs to be removed / documented asap.

  • Joe Barrett
    Joe Barrett 3 ngày trước

    Excellent video. Thank you

  • Petsto
    Petsto 3 ngày trước

    To be clear Airbus also has every automatation you can possible Imagen. But as far i know it will always tell the pilots exactly what it does (and why) and secondly with few buttons you can turn off all automatation. (regardless to say that the plane is then much more difficult to fly)

  • Paul Gibbs
    Paul Gibbs 3 ngày trước

    Nothing about centre of gravity?

  • Ehtu Ehtu Niges
    Ehtu Ehtu Niges 3 ngày trước

    🇪🇹🇪🇹🇪🇹🇪🇹😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

  • Zahid Khurshid
    Zahid Khurshid 3 ngày trước

    Boeing needs to be shutdown immediately. More 300 people died what else is it gonna take to stop these guys from making planes. What's even more concerning is that FAA was letting Boeing certify their own planes. Unreal. Both should legal consequences one of them being complete shut down of Boeing.

    • Black
      Black 3 ngày trước

      You lost me at "Boeing needs to be shutdown immediately".

  • Bail 10k
    Bail 10k 3 ngày trước +2

    who else has flown on one of these 737 max?? scary.

  • Weldon Young
    Weldon Young 3 ngày trước

    OK, so the Boeing 737 Max has the same type rating as other Boeing 737s. The pilots fly it just like any other 737. That's problem number ONE.
    NOW the poor pilots are in the Boeing 737 Max when MCAS takes control. Here is where poor design comes in: pilots not informed; no reliance on multiple sensor input; & Boeing know about this problem about a year before the Ethiopian crash. WHY IS IT TAKING SO LONG TO CERTIFY A FIT ???

  • That Man In the Yellow Shirt 2000

    Or, I dunno... MAKE TALLER LANDING GEARS.

  • Victor Gonzalez
    Victor Gonzalez 3 ngày trước

    very well done the low level of experience of the crews should have been mention key factor

  • Natsumei
    Natsumei 3 ngày trước

    yeah nice job boeing, you use software instead of reengineering. you know, software..the thing that can be easily hacked/changed/tampered *sigh

  • yano agustino
    yano agustino 3 ngày trước +1

    Tbh, after those 2 boeing's accidents I always checked out the plane that I will board first, is it boeing or airbus (of course I prefer airbus rn)

    • Razvan Sindilaru
      Razvan Sindilaru 2 ngày trước

      Man b 737 max is the only boeing bad plane....... for example the 777. It's one of the mort safest plane man or the 787

  • EagleOneoOne
    EagleOneoOne 4 ngày trước

    Gremlins, bro. Totally gremlins.

  • Zyvren 13
    Zyvren 13 4 ngày trước +1

    FAA's certification of this 737 max 8 planes, proves that their relationship with BOEING is not sufficiently strict. Pilots were unaware of this manuevering characteristic augmentation system. Its not even mentioned on their checklist since the checklist is the same as the old 737.

  • muhammad hamzah
    muhammad hamzah 4 ngày trước

    The real reason: American people ambition, greed, and stupidity

  • Beatrice Noel
    Beatrice Noel 4 ngày trước

    Greed man... GREED!!!

  • Mathias Hermon
    Mathias Hermon 4 ngày trước +6

    This makes me very sad. I never thought Boeing would mess up like this…

  • Alan Caldoza
    Alan Caldoza 4 ngày trước

    Building a new one to behave like the old one. Then what kind of mindset is that for Boeing.. If that's their goal then why build a new one rather than continue building an old one. Airbus building the A321 but retains the old proven A320 design with minor upgrade but not on its flught computers.

    • Jamenator1
      Jamenator1 4 ngày trước

      Actually airbus does upgrade the flight control software, some of them are fairly substantial changes. Airbus designed the FBW to make the handling of all their FBW aircraft, from the A318 to the A380, as close to each other as possible as this reduces training costs due to the aircraft behaving similarly to each other. Its a good bet that airbus would have also tweaked the FBW on the A320NEO to accommodate for the much larger engines. Even aircraft already in service can receive upgrades to the FBW

  • Alan Caldoza
    Alan Caldoza 4 ngày trước +3

    Its electronics I believe is sabotage by extremist by getting into subcontractor companies. Its better that way than planting a device on planes

  • Jan Verboven
    Jan Verboven 4 ngày trước +1

    The BIG problem is - beyond the HEAVY loss of life, which will leave the families on the ground bereaved for their the rest of their lives, BOEING seems untouchable - too BIG to fail.

  • Bruce Bedlam
    Bruce Bedlam 4 ngày trước +6

    Thanks for telling us the truth.

  • WTF STUDIO INC.
    WTF STUDIO INC. 5 ngày trước +1

    Greedy effing people!!! No regards to human life!!!

  • sugas riyanto
    sugas riyanto 5 ngày trước

    airbus is better

  • kalyan raghavan
    kalyan raghavan 5 ngày trước

    Sir, hats off to you. For bringing out a best and investigative video on Max Boeing. It was really a careless and casual attitude, which took the lives of more than 400 passengers. Boeing should take passengers safety as top priority absolutely and shouldn't care about fuel consumption, competitor activities, and cost savings.

  • [Insert Name]
    [Insert Name] 5 ngày trước +1

    In a nutshell: People died of money

  • Nehemiah Scudder
    Nehemiah Scudder 5 ngày trước

    The 737 Max crashed *twice* because Boing executives tried to cover up their slapdash design and manufacturing processes after the first crash.
    It crashed the first time because the FAA decided to give Boing a free pass so that a European company did not gain a commercial advantage over an American company, sacrificing their reputation as a competent air safety body on the altar of "American exceptionalism"
    All the phrase "American exceptionalism" means now is "Buy anything *except American"* whenever possible.

  • Technology and Innovation
    Technology and Innovation 5 ngày trước

    With recent orders placed by American Airlines with Airbus, every American in fact every passenger should avoid this airplane.

  • Technology and Innovation
    Technology and Innovation 5 ngày trước +1

    ex BOEING:
    BOEING needs to come clean. By placing the engine higher causes the air dynamics around the fuselage to behave differently than before, it creates turbulence immediate to the sensors causing the hardware to misinterpret input. So hardware is not malfunctioning but characteristics of the design change is causing the catastrophic failure. It is more severe than what they are claiming in the media. A pilot when working at night (instrument flying) will need to be more cautious and better trained then today to fly safely. Inevitably no matter what BOEING states this aircraft will have more problems then prior models.
    Boeing is gambling with people's lives to fatten its pocket. BOEING thinks it can wash its hand from every incident in future by claiming that it was pilots error and therefore no blame can be attributed to the company ... as they did soon after the two crashes.

  • NPC AFRO
    NPC AFRO 5 ngày trước +8

    *Better Flight on A320*

  • Shawn Rebello
    Shawn Rebello 5 ngày trước

    Wouldn't it have been easier to simply raise the height of the aircraft by installing taller landing gear? The engines could then have been accommodated under the wing I suppose.

    • Giuseppe Cochi
      Giuseppe Cochi 5 ngày trước

      Sorry, that was bodged up job

    • Giuseppe Cochi
      Giuseppe Cochi 5 ngày trước

      It comes back to the fact that this aircraft fuselage is the same as the original 100 series, if they had extended the length of the main landing gear it would not be able to fit into the existing fuselage undercarriage bay so retraction would be impossible, hence the bodied up job of moving the engine forward and up

  • Gary Looper
    Gary Looper 5 ngày trước

    Simple fact is that as "Flawed" as the Max may or may not be, BOTH CRASHES WERE PILOT ERROR! The first because the exact plane that crashed had the error the previous day and the crew solved the problem by turning off the malfunctioning equipment, Therefore the crew knew how to handle the error. The second because the crew fixed the problem in the air by turning off the malfunctioning equipment and then turned the malfunctioning equipment back on!

  • HEED
    HEED 5 ngày trước +6

    and the corruption continues. They didn't anything to solve the problem. updating the software does not make the plane safe. I will never fly on a boeing 737 .

  • Alison Mihailovich
    Alison Mihailovich 6 ngày trước

    Russian made Super Jet - 100 is better and cheaper ! Irish City Jet fly them now . Its good

  • Bernievids
    Bernievids 6 ngày trước

    I hope this is true.

  • prolazy55 lazlaz
    prolazy55 lazlaz 6 ngày trước

    I feel bad

  • Nonya Busi
    Nonya Busi 6 ngày trước

    Boeing needs in prison.

  • Eric Rojo
    Eric Rojo 6 ngày trước

    Isn't it ironic that unbridled free enterprise and competition is touted as the solution to bad design decisions and poor quality products (at least in the U.S.). This is one instance where that is not the case.

  • MF SF
    MF SF 6 ngày trước +2

    ...and who from Boeing will make jail time for keeping secret that tiny insignificant detail? Sorry... naive question...
    And the money wins 👌

  • Karen Van Vuuren
    Karen Van Vuuren 6 ngày trước

    Very impressive video!

  • Daniel
    Daniel 6 ngày trước

    It was possible to rush it, because boeing is USA...and USA has da power :)

  • Paul Williams
    Paul Williams 6 ngày trước

    Ř

  • Sleepy
    Sleepy 6 ngày trước +9

    As much as people say competition is an inevitable good that comes out of capitalism, the free market naturally moves towards monopolies or singular entities with large marketshare because generally it costs way less for the companies and consumers.
    Having to only train one pilot to fly two different planes is easier than learning 8. And it costs less for the airline

  • Chris Kingston
    Chris Kingston 6 ngày trước

    Take a train next time you go on holiday

    • Benoit Vanhees
      Benoit Vanhees 6 ngày trước

      And by preference a European train :)

  • This is Kate
    This is Kate 6 ngày trước +23

    I took two Airbus coming back home from Italy to US. I felt very safe. Lol

    • Gannicus
      Gannicus Ngày trước

      Nobody safe when flying..

    • Feyd
      Feyd 3 ngày trước +2

      well, watch out for the 737 max next time.

  • Tenshi
    Tenshi 6 ngày trước +1

    Capitalism at its finest.

    • Executiva Crypto
      Executiva Crypto 3 ngày trước

      Fly with a sukhoi super jet 100 on russia then, lol

  • 유소영
    유소영 7 ngày trước

    Why do we keep letting U.S. take advantage of the rest of the world. If this happened in U.S. and if the victims were American? It would have brought the company down.

  • OneGuyOnAScooter
    OneGuyOnAScooter 7 ngày trước

    Let the record show that greed and envy for money and success can cause terrible accidents and huge loss of life.

  • Travis Phillips
    Travis Phillips 7 ngày trước

    Hmmm I’ve seen another video that goes over exactly everything you just said. Weird

  • JLUMINADO
    JLUMINADO 7 ngày trước

    In my personal opinion which more than likely would never happen is the CEO and everyone else that gave thr ok, should get fired and see criminal charges immediately, the FAA should have an internal investigation for not looking further into it than just taking Boeing's own certifications and again it'll never happen but I would have them scrap all 737 max 8 planes immediately. The worst part about it is that what ever they decide to do, we don't actually know what kind of planes we're risking our lives getting into. It's sad.

  • hampala tacklebox
    hampala tacklebox 7 ngày trước +1

    Video subtitles: how the killing machine born

    • hampala tacklebox
      hampala tacklebox 5 ngày trước

      MI6 DC10: old killing machine

    • MI6
      MI6 5 ngày trước

      DC10: am I a joke to you

  • csjaugiedog
    csjaugiedog 7 ngày trước

    @4:28 "The pilots continued to fight with the MCAS" Continued?? Why? The battle with MCAS never should have happened. FAILURE #1 They diverted their attention away from FLYING THE AIRPLANE. If they had simply turned off electric pitch trim and concentrated on a KNOWN PITCH AND POWER SETTING, the crash would not have happened! NEVER deviate from basic aircraft control. Pitch trim was changing uncommanded. The only way that's possible is with the electric trim system. @23:22, They knew something was wrong with pitch trim, yet they allowed the problem to continue while wasting precious time consulting the manual. Many situations can and do occur that demand a purely instinctive and automatic response. This was one of those situations MCAS did not kill those people...the pilots did!

  • I got my eyes on U
    I got my eyes on U 7 ngày trước

    THEY KEEP ON MAKING JET ENGINES MORE AND MORE BETTER BUT NOT ONE HAVE NEVER TRIED TO BUILD AN ENGINE FOR AIRPLANES THAT DONT STALL UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE? THEN HOW COME ROCKET ENGINES DONT STALL GOING UP AND PASSING ALL LAYERS OF OUR ATMOSPHERE?

  • Ashton Manivanh At gaming
    Ashton Manivanh At gaming 7 ngày trước +8

    3:33 no MCAS means “MAY CRASH ANY SECOND”

  • David Henderson
    David Henderson 7 ngày trước

    The corny music track is not only irrelevant but detracts from the credibility of an otherwise good report.

  • Andrej Passco
    Andrej Passco 7 ngày trước

    so instead change put new wheels they decide to control the plane over one sensor.. Great idea

  • ROET
    ROET 7 ngày trước +24

    If its a Boeing ,i am not going!🤗